It does two thousand Trasmaco years and Calicles discussed about which it could just be the political regime. Both agreed in a thing: he would be that one that recognizes and preserves the original inequality between the men. The discrepancy started off of which such preservation of the inequality stops Trasmaco could occur under any governmental form, whereas for Calicles it would only be possible through the tyranny. As we know, it placed diagonally Plato, whom that said justice is equality, and that stops to manage it deberia to practice the virtue that is to take a virtuous life. By the same author: Daryl Katz. Therefore, the objective of the political man was not confined to its ambition of being able or ” pleonexia”. Its anxiety of being able plagued of violence and injustice extended, for – as Scrates- preached to obtain the perfection of the citizens in its measured joust or proportion.
The power was – Plato dixit- a good, because it represented the order that tended to make real what it was considered just Is this thus? The power can never be analyzed in abstract and is clear that it is always exerted by a group of the society, and very hardly store to communal property but, the more is worth, responds to or of the group holds that it. Perhaps at first it appears, yes, as something over the sectorial interests but once affirmed will see that it is of being thus. Powerful or the powerful ones of turn act, in a certain sense, faced the rest of the society and to conserve that power, objectively they must exert a concealed coercion or open and mainly today in main day one of sustentoa will be the supporting speech. The today citizen is somewhat perplex, after to have read a news article to Helmut Dubiel, about the lie as he forms to make policy.